| Featured Legal Services |
|---|
| About Dilanchian | ||
|---|---|---|
What we do |Testimonials |FAQ
|
| Latest Library Content |
|---|
| Keyword Search |
|---|
| Is your know-how under-valued? | | Print | |
| Written by Noric Dilanchian | ||||||
| Tuesday, 18 December 2007 | ||||||
|
Fewer still evaluate or formally value their know-how. They are not helped by accountants, lawyers and advisers who respond with generic textbook approaches.
In our knowledge economy a big problem is the gap in knowledge about know-how. The problem is experienced regularly. It arises for example in licensing transactions. How can you effectively use a contract to license know-how to generate fees or royalties if you haven't first properly defined your know-how?
Even if there is some documentation, the really valuable know-how may not be recorded. It may also not be communicated in any extranet, operations plan or manual. What is recorded and communicated may be arranged randomly making it time consuming to discover quickly.
Due to such obstacles unfortunately a great deal of know-how remains in peoples' heads and walks out the door when they leave. There are practical, effective and economical solutions to this problem.
The failure to capture and value know-how comes to a head in a business sale. It's too late if negotiations have already begun. It's impossibly difficult to ask a buyer to pay you extra for the know-how to be sold if you haven't already properly defined it. Without predefinition potential bidders cannot easily conduct a due diligence or an inspection.
Those bidders will not get a real sense of what the valued know-how is; nor how it will sustain the continued viability of the business. There's also the risk for the seller that an astute buyer will acquire the business for a song.
Even though there is a problem textbook-trained professionals can't help. Accounting standards have a bias against know-how. In simple terms, they pretend it does not exist.
For lawyers (including those who profess to be specialists in intellectual property) enquiries about know-how almost invariably result in a pull-down menu with just one option - confidential information agreement, AKA non-disclosure agreement. The bullet points below illustrate how this puts the (document) cart before the (know-how) horse.
Solutions for protecting confidential information under the law generally become practical if you:
We work with clients and attend to the above bullet points. We work with client know-how in the nature of skills, tools, methodologies, systems, workflow, project management or enterprise resource management.
There are many inspiring industry-specific examples illustrating the way forward. Know-how translates into value the more it is identified, defined, recorded, documented and further developed. We actively do it for clients. Those with franchises do it. Companies providing training services and workshop modules do it. Even educated coaches, mediators, facilitators and advisers do it. So let's do it, let's put a value on know-how. (Apologies to Cole Porter.)
With little know-how definition or documentation, new clients knock on our door angry that they've been ripped off by former employees or former collaborators or partners. Sometimes they arrive with their lawyer-made and signed confidential information contract in hand. Yet the best advice we often give to them is - "Take no court action, swallow your pride, lose your anger and focus on ways of preventing such loss re-occurring." Months or years later these same clients thank us for having stood our ground and avoided a courtroom disaster.
| ||||||
|
||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Main Menu | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Free Tools |
|---|
| Registered Users | |
|---|---|
|

