Business lawyers specialising in technology and intellectual property law, management and commercialisation

Dilanchian Lawyers & Consultants

Dilanchian Lawyers & Consultants

Blackhole expenditure: new tax deductions

E-mail Print PDF

blackholeA whole new range of business expenditure has become tax deductable under amendments to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (Act). The expenditure is intriguingly called "blackhole expenditure".  This article overviews the new blackhole expenditure tax deduction provisions, particularly for expenses relating to intellectual property and its commercialisation.

1.  What is blackhole expenditure?

One Australian Government website defines the phrase this way: "Blackholes occur when business expenses are not recognised under the income tax laws." The formal name of the new law is Tax Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No. 1) Act 2006.

Blackhole expenditure is made up primarily of business start-up costs. For example, for the commercialisation of intellectual property, a spin-off or start-up company might be formed. The new blackhole provisions may provide tax deductions for commercialisation costs incurred by the intellectual property originator, provided they are not claimable elsewhere.

Read more...
 

How to make contracts more certain and less costly

E-mail Print PDF

contract_text_thumb It's time to stop believing the myth that lawyers can provide legal protection with words alone. In addition to words, protection in contacts requires knowledge and know-how regarding business process, policies, training, standards, and codes of conduct. Why is this so?

The reason is that context has become as important as content. The context of a contractual or other legal relationship between two or more parties has become as important as the words the parties choose to communicate and set the terms between each other.

Read more...
 

iiNet's copyright victory in round one cost $5.7 million

E-mail Print PDF

iinet_logoIn February 2010 there have been two significant copyright decisions. The first is Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24. This first instance Federal Court of Australia decision went against the copyright claimants, 34 companies involved largely in film production funding and distribution.

In November 2008 they sued iiNet Ltd which claims the third largest number of clients for ISP services after Telstra and Optus. This followed a five month investigation by Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft ("AFACT") which was the lead representative for the 34 applicants. The round one hearing ran for 20 days.

At this time no appeal has been filed, but one is likely. That will be round two. [Update 25 Feb: An appeal has now been filed.]

Read more...
 

Want a work visa for Australia?

E-mail Print PDF
Tags: migration

hense_ozClients often come into my office and make a simple request: "I want to apply for a work visa." The reality is that strictly speaking a substantial number of visas are not granted because of work reasons. Instead, they may have a right to work attached. What do I mean?

First, there are over 100 different visas types. The Department of Immigration has recently tried to reduce that number with changes relevant to skilled visas. Second, popular permanent visas include these two categories:

-   partner visas, this is a relationship-based visas; and
-   points tested skilled visas.
Read more...
 

The Colour Purple: an exercise in expensive litigation

E-mail Print PDF
lb_thumbnail“Wouldn’t it be nice if the world was Cadbury?”, proclaim its advertisements ad nauseam. Well, as long as you’re not locked in a legal battle with them. Aggressive legal tactics, backroom deals - the food and retail giant is pulling out all stops.
Read more...
 


Page 8 of 78

Subscribe

newsletter Get it free This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Free Tools

To download Free Tools create your Registered User account