How does puffery about Sarah Palin become valuable airspace? How are Palin and Poh Ling Yeow linked by their desire for media presence?
Consider what process may have occurred that caused Australians to collectively recognise “
We have often written about the use of law to make and keep products and people celebrities. It’s the story of how to identify, build and own a trend.
Identification of a trend is the first step. The trend may be real or manufactured. Palin was plucked from relative obscurity to what seemed to be immediate prominence. Dressed and coiffed to project an image. Polished with the services of PR experts and public affairs coaches and later talent agents, ghostwriters, publicists and charity coordinators. Given dramatisation of her life story, edited storylines, and strategic highlighting of elements to stimulate attention. All this to build her credibility and form a relationship with the target American audience.
There was something about
Media presence builds trends. Palin had more publicity than money can buy in the 2008
Like Palin,
On the net today, a simple recipe for noodles with a dash of chilli sauce becomes “
Intellectual property and commercial law is used to raise and own celebrities. The laws at work include trade mark, domain names, copyright, trade practices and contracts. Additionally, in the
Law protects against misleading representations, eg those who claim an association they don’t have with
Ideas are not protected by copyright law. This is a basic premise of copyright law. If ideas are like airspace, then valuable airspace is packaged by the combination of laws mentioned above. Celebrities then trade packaged airspace.
Attributing celebrity values to products and people is a modern industrial process. It is built with hype, spin and buzz, all seeking to build consumer habits. Law can be applied to build in support. The greater the control over these ingredients, the more likely it is that celebrity status and net wealth will be built.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



