Featured Legal Services

   > Trade Mark Registration

   > Internet, IT & E-business

   > HR & Enterprise Structuring

   > Deal Making & Contracting

   > IP Transactions

   > Commercialisation Strategy
 

Related Blog Posts
Keyword Search
advertising beverage branding business finance business law business model business policies and procedures business sale/purchase business structuring case study checklist china commercialisation communications compliance confidential information contract copyright corporations law definitions digital rights management domain name e-commerce entertainment industry entrepreneurship fashion food futurism human resources index information technology innovation intellectual property internet invention ip licensing ip management ip protection ip revenue ip strategy legal history legal knowledge management legal risk management licensing litigation marketing law migration music negotiation patent project management publishing retailing security spam statistics strategy taxation technology management trade mark trade practices trends trust law united kingdom united states valuation venture capital web 2.0 web ventures wine
Taxation, IP and Jersey Trusts PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Library
Written by Anton Joseph   
Friday, 10 November 2006

jersey_trustsThe law of trusts in Jersey (part of the Channel Islands) underwent massive changes in September 2006 that may prove to be a boon to intellectual property (IP) commercialisation ventures using Jersey trusts.

 

It is common to use Jersey trusts with a corporate trustee, which can be an "exempt company" under Jersey laws.

 

The most crucial feature of trusts in Jersey is that trustees are not subject to Jersey tax provided the beneficiaries are not resident in Jersey and the trust does not derive income from sources within Jersey. Importantly, Jersey does not impose capital gains tax on disposals in Jersey.

 

A discretionary trust may be not only an ideal vehicle for  holding and disposal of  IP, but also for efficient distribution of income and capital to its beneficiaries.

Until now, a  major problem faced by settlors of a trust  (owners of IP) in Jersey was that they lost control over the trust assets  (IP) to the trustees, who were able to ignore the wishes of the  owner of the IP in dealing with the assets of the trust and also in decisions about their disposal. The amendments to the law have decisively changed this position.

 

The three relevant amendments relate to:

  • reservation of powers of trust settlors, who would be the owners of IP assets;
  • disregard of foreign law claims in respect of trust disputes; and
  • removal of the rule that a trust cannot continue beyond a specific period.

The amendments allow the owner-settlor to reserve almost all powers of the trustee to himself or herself so that, unlike in the past, he/she is not compelled to rely on the trustee for decisions on distribution of income and disposal of trust assets, especially the IP.

 

Any disputes arising in respect of trusts according to any foreign law will not have any effect on Jersey trusts. Therefore claims against the settler-owner under Australian law will not be taken into consideration by the courts in Jersey.

 

Unlike in other jurisdictions, the trust will not be limited to a specified period after which the trust assets must vest absolutely in the beneficiaries. This amendment will allow the trust assets to be transferred to another trust without regard to the rule that the assets must vest within a specified period.

 

This short article overviews a limited area of taxation of trusts in Jersey. The article is of a general nature. Before using trusts in Jersey you should seek professional advice and review your specific circumstances. 

 



Author: Profile of Anton Joseph | Contact

 

Further Reading - articles by Anton Joseph

 

     

Taxation law    

Taxation, IP and Jersey Trusts
Directors: beware of ATO letters and section 222 notices
Blackhole expenditure: new tax deductions
April 2007 deadline to review and fix service trusts 
Non-residents - no capital gains tax on sale of shares

Finance and securities law

Financial services regulation of non-cash payment facilities

Business valuation with EBIT multiples
Business valuation with price earnings multiples 
Private equity or private debt? Beware the Ides of March.

 

Business structuring

Coping with complexity in business structuring 

Practical Rap: Trusts in Business

Corporate regulation

Rethinking Regulation [PDF] 

Regulation overkill comes full circle

 

   Search: Quick links to Lighbulb posts   |   Site search   |   Library downloads   |   Library search              

 

 
< Prev
Main Menu
Home
Profile
Solutions
Projects
People
Library
Training Services
Events
Location Map
Free Tools
Registered Users
Username

Password

Remember me
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register